Ethical Viewpoints

Ethical Viewpoints $(function() { $('#tabs1, #tabs1a, #tabs2').tabify() } )
Free Online Articles Directory Why Submit Articles? Top Authors Top Articles FAQ Publish Article 15.03.2009 | Login | Register | Hello Guest Email Password Remember Me
forgot your password?
Home Page News & Society Ethical Viewpoints Ethical Viewpoints Posted: Mar 11th, 2009 | Comments: 0 | Views: 2 var random_number = Math.random(); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='http://js.articlesbase.com/gadsA.js?v=1.0006' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); Related Articles Related Q&A Accounting Ethics Courses: Optional or NecessaryEthics And The InternetEthical Situations in CounsellingEthics and Counselling ApplicationsEthical Conduct: the Importance of High Moral StandardsEthics in Business ? From Compliance to CommitmentEthics in Business - From Compliance to Commitment Ask the community a question about this article:
Q&A Powered by: Syndicate this Article Copy to clipboard Ethical ViewpointsAuthor: Shelley Godra

Ethical Viewpoints

Written by Shelley Godra 

How far would you go to help a friend?  Would you risk breaking the law?  These questions plagued my conscience last year when I opened my home to a close friend running from the military. In my opinion, I felt like I did the right thing offering my friend, Josh, a place to stay when he needed it the most; however, some people may disagree with my decision. Depending on the viewpoint, this situation could be seen as being ethically right or ethically wrong.

My friend enlisted into the Navy in the spring of 2006.  Josh completed boot camp and was staying at a naval base in Virginia.  In the beginning of the winter, he ran into some trouble and his punishment was 72 hours in the naval prison.  Instead of completing his jail sentence, Josh decided to leave the naval base and was considered absent without leave or "AWOL."  When he showed up on my doorstep, I had the dilemma of deciding whether to let him stay or to send him on his way. 

A person with a transcendentalist viewpoint would have not only sent him on his way but would have also turned Josh over to the military authorities.  The transcendentalist viewpoint is motivated and committed to judging ethical situations based upon a religious standing.  There are either good or bad ethical decisions; there are neither gray areas nor excuses for bad ethical decisions.  Someone with this point of view would consider the actions both Josh and I took to be morally and ethically wrong.  Like the transcendentalist viewpoint, the legitimist viewpoint would also categorize this situation as being ethically wrong if he indeed broke the law.

The legitimist viewpoint holds the law above all other decision-making influences.  When considering if an action is ethically correct, someone with a legitimist point of view would look to see if the action followed government laws and policies.  In my situation, both Josh and I did not follow the laws.  Josh broke the law when he left the naval base and became AWOL, and I broke the law when I allowed him to stay at my house without turning him over to the military.  The individualist viewpoint would also see this situation as being ethically wrong, however, the reasoning is completely different.

The individualist viewpoint is only concerned with the advancement and capitalization of one's own position in society.  Someone with this point of view would believe housing Josh as wrong because there is a chance of being punished by government authorities themselves.  This viewpoint also does not take existing relationships into perspective when making ethical decision; therefore, it would not matter to someone with individualist thinking that Josh is a close friend and needs help.  In contrast, there are viewpoints that would perceive this situation as being ethical.

The systemicist viewpoint looks at the bigger picture of an ethical dilemma and sees how everyone is affected by the decision. A person holding a systemicist viewpoint believes that the decision is ethically correct if it is good for the majority of the people involved.  In this particular situation, not only were Josh and I affected but also his family and the military.  Josh would have been out on the streets, running from the government, and on his own if I had turned him away.  His family would have been devastated if he had gotten caught and was sentenced to a period in jail.  The military has enough issues to deal with and does not need to be chasing an AWOL seaman around the country.  The majority of concerned parties' interests would have chosen to have Josh stay at my house rather than be turned into the government or be denied shelter. 

The conventionalist viewpoint also looks at the bigger picture when deciding what is ethically correct.  Someone characterized as portraying a conventionalist viewpoint would determine what is ethically right and wrong by looking at what the majority of society would choose.  This reasoning is supported by the idea that most people are inherently good.  The majority of society would say that breaking the law is bad, however, the greater amount would also say that helping a close friend in need has superiority over the latter action.  Fellow peers and family would also agree with the previous decision of helping Josh.  Once putting priority to actions, the conventionalist viewpoint would assume assisting and housing Josh is the widely accepted ethical decision.  Furthermore, the experientialist viewpoint would consider this situation as doing the right thing.

An experientialist viewpoint relies on "gut feelings" and an intuitive sense of right.  A person with this point of view, like myself, does not think the situation through before deciding upon an ethical decision.  When I opened my door that day to find Josh, I knew instinctively that I would help him through his hardship.  I did not have to weigh the pros and cons to know whether or not I needed to help with his crisis.  I do not regret opening up my home to Josh; however, the decision may have been different if the situation was altered.

I would have turned Josh away from my home had a few details been altered in this ethical situation.  First, the severity of his charges would have changed my mind; Josh had gotten in trouble at the Virginia naval base for underage drinking.  If Josh had injured other people or committed a more severe crime then I would have not allowed him a place to stay.  Second, the parties involved could have swayed my decision as well.  If the FBI or another type of high profile government agency were chasing him then I would have turned him away based upon the individualist viewpoint.  I would not have risked the chance of jail in order to help my AWOL friend. 

In conclusion, there are several viewpoints that can be taken for every ethical situation; however, there is no absolute right viewpoint.  The concept taken when making ethical decisions depends on the predicament, the severity, and the people involved.  In this particular situation, Josh was my friend and needed help.  I did not care that he was AWOL and wanted by the military; I felt that our friendship was more important than the law.  I do not regret my decision, and I think I was ethically right.

About the Author:

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/news-and-society-articles/ethical-viewpoints-812537.html

Ethical Viewpoints

Written by Shelley Godra 

How far would you go to help a friend?  Would you risk breaking the law?  These questions plagued my conscience last year when I opened my home to a close friend running from the military. In my opinion, I felt like I did the right thing offering my friend, Josh, a place to stay when he needed it the most; however, some people may disagree with my decision. Depending on the viewpoint, this situation could be seen as being ethically right or ethically wrong.

My friend enlisted into the Navy in the spring of 2006.  Josh completed boot camp and was staying at a naval base in Virginia.  In the beginning of the winter, he ran into some trouble and his punishment was 72 hours in the naval prison.  Instead of completing his jail sentence, Josh decided to leave the naval base and was considered absent without leave or "AWOL."  When he showed up on my doorstep, I had the dilemma of deciding whether to let him stay or to send him on his way. 

A person with a transcendentalist viewpoint would have not only sent him on his way but would have also turned Josh over to the military authorities.  The transcendentalist viewpoint is motivated and committed to judging ethical situations based upon a religious standing.  There are either good or bad ethical decisions; there are neither gray areas nor excuses for bad ethical decisions.  Someone with this point of view would consider the actions both Josh and I took to be morally and ethically wrong.  Like the transcendentalist viewpoint, the legitimist viewpoint would also categorize this situation as being ethically wrong if he indeed broke the law.

The legitimist viewpoint holds the law above all other decision-making influences.  When considering if an action is ethically correct, someone with a legitimist point of view would look to see if the action followed government laws and policies.  In my situation, both Josh and I did not follow the laws.  Josh broke the law when he left the naval base and became AWOL, and I broke the law when I allowed him to stay at my house without turning him over to the military.  The individualist viewpoint would also see this situation as being ethically wrong, however, the reasoning is completely different.

The individualist viewpoint is only concerned with the advancement and capitalization of one's own position in society.  Someone with this point of view would believe housing Josh as wrong because there is a chance of being punished by government authorities themselves.  This viewpoint also does not take existing relationships into perspective when making ethical decision; therefore, it would not matter to someone with individualist thinking that Josh is a close friend and needs help.  In contrast, there are viewpoints that would perceive this situation as being ethical.

The systemicist viewpoint looks at the bigger picture of an ethical dilemma and sees how everyone is affected by the decision. A person holding a systemicist viewpoint believes that the decision is ethically correct if it is good for the majority of the people involved.  In this particular situation, not only were Josh and I affected but also his family and the military.  Josh would have been out on the streets, running from the government, and on his own if I had turned him away.  His family would have been devastated if he had gotten caught and was sentenced to a period in jail.  The military has enough issues to deal with and does not need to be chasing an AWOL seaman around the country.  The majority of concerned parties' interests would have chosen to have Josh stay at my house rather than be turned into the government or be denied shelter. 

The conventionalist viewpoint also looks at the bigger picture when deciding what is ethically correct.  Someone characterized as portraying a conventionalist viewpoint would determine what is ethically right and wrong by looking at what the majority of society would choose.  This reasoning is supported by the idea that most people are inherently good.  The majority of society would say that breaking the law is bad, however, the greater amount would also say that helping a close friend in need has superiority over the latter action.  Fellow peers and family would also agree with the previous decision of helping Josh.  Once putting priority to actions, the conventionalist viewpoint would assume assisting and housing Josh is the widely accepted ethical decision.  Furthermore, the experientialist viewpoint would consider this situation as doing the right thing.

An experientialist viewpoint relies on "gut feelings" and an intuitive sense of right.  A person with this point of view, like myself, does not think the situation through before deciding upon an ethical decision.  When I opened my door that day to find Josh, I knew instinctively that I would help him through his hardship.  I did not have to weigh the pros and cons to know whether or not I needed to help with his crisis.  I do not regret opening up my home to Josh; however, the decision may have been different if the situation was altered.

I would have turned Josh away from my home had a few details been altered in this ethical situation.  First, the severity of his charges would have changed my mind; Josh had gotten in trouble at the Virginia naval base for underage drinking.  If Josh had injured other people or committed a more severe crime then I would have not allowed him a place to stay.  Second, the parties involved could have swayed my decision as well.  If the FBI or another type of high profile government agency were chasing him then I would have turned him away based upon the individualist viewpoint.  I would not have risked the chance of jail in order to help my AWOL friend. 

In conclusion, there are several viewpoints that can be taken for every ethical situation; however, there is no absolute right viewpoint.  The concept taken when making ethical decisions depends on the predicament, the severity, and the people involved.  In this particular situation, Josh was my friend and needed help.  I did not care that he was AWOL and wanted by the military; I felt that our friendship was more important than the law.  I do not regret my decision, and I think I was ethically right.

Rate this Article: 1 2 3 4 5 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s) Print Email Re-Publish addthis_pub = 'articlesbase'; addthis_brand = 'ArticlesBase.com'; addthis_options = 'twitter, favorites, email, reddit, stumbleupon, delicious, facebook, google, more';
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/news-and-society-articles/ethical-viewpoints-812537.html Article Tags: Ethics, Dilemmas Add new Comment Your Name * Your Email: * Comment Body *
Enter Validation Code: *
Latest News and Society Articles More from Shelley Godra The Erosion Of America? Stand Tall And Fight For The Values Of Our Founding FathersBy: Bryan J Buckner | 15/03/2009
Are You Upset With the State of the Economy? Have You Lost the Bulk of Your Savings "nest Egg"? Has You Home Value Dropped and Now You Owe More That It's Worth? Do You Have a Core Set of Values That You Believe In? Those Core Set of Values Have Been Forgotten and It's Time to Revive Them and Get our Country Back.

Ramayana By Valmiki Was Not Just A LegendBy: Amlan Roychowdhury | 15/03/2009
When We Were Children our Noted Film Maker Mr.ramanand Sagar Launched His Opus Magnum Ramayana on Indian Television and During Those Days Color Television Was a Novelty in Every Household And, Though Under Strict Government Control, the Televisions Had a Limited Number of Channels. This Teleserial Was Aired in the Evening Prime Time Slot and We Clearly Remember That We Would not Shift Anywhere During That Hour and Would Watch Ramayana With Rapt Attention.

The 10 Most Annoying Things Your Co-Workers Do By: 104inc.com | 13/03/2009
I'm not Sure That I Agree With This List From Forbes - Some of Them, Yes. But There are Definitely a Few Missing... One of My Pet Peeves is Listening to Loud Phone Conversations That Aren't Work-related. Ok, Loud Phone Conversations Annoy Me Even if They are Work-related, But at Least You Can Make a Case for Those.

Important News For All Sportsmen In The U.S. Who Care About Their 2Nd Amendment RightsBy: Greg Bruning | 13/03/2009
A Recent Press Release From M.d. Sen. Coburn's Office, Stated That President Obama Has Authored a Bill (obama's Bill S2433), and it is Now in the Senate, to Give the UN .7% of our Gnp to be Used to Feed Hungry 3rd World Country People (an Amazing Thought, But One Step Closer to Global Socialization) and to Use UN Force to Disarm You and Me and All Gun Owners.

One Of The Poorest Countries In The WorldBy: John Parks | 13/03/2009
The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is a Landlocked Country, Located in the Center of the Asian Continent. Afghanistan is an Ancient Region That is Full of Historical Prominence, Sharing History With Bordering Countries Like Iran, Pakistan, and China, and Has Historically Linked With Several Outer Countries Like the Soviet Union, and the United States of America.

History of the Samurai SwordBy: D Cooper | 13/03/2009
The Samurai sword would be more properly defined as any Japanese sword wielded by Samurai or Bushi, as they were known in Japanese history; however modern films and television shows have incorrectly portrayed them to be only the well known katana, and very rarely use the proper terminology or classifications...

African-American History Month and White PrivilegeBy: Kim Olver | 13/03/2009
As I am sure you are aware, February is African-American History Month in the United States. This is the time of year when most schools will present some program to their students discussing Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and maybe Rosa Parks. However, there are many unsung heroes of the...

How Is Electricity Produced?By: Louie Wallcrawler | 13/03/2009
A More Precise Definition Could be Electricity is the Surge of Electrons. Every Object is Composed of Atoms. in Every Atom There is the Nucleus or the Center Which is Surrounded by Negatively Charged Particles Called Electrons. Inside the Nucleus are Positively Charged Particles Called Protons and

Sarbanes-Oxley ActBy: Shelley Godra | 11/03/2009 | Accounting
This article summarizes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It also estimates the effect the act will have on the accounting field.

Social Security MythsBy: Shelley Godra | 11/03/2009 | Personal Finance
This article takes the most common myths about the social security crisis and looks for any validity in the statements.

Globally Effecting Small BusinessesBy: Shelley Godra | 11/03/2009 | Small Business
This article delves into the issue of globalization. It uses an example of a small Italian restaurant to show the effects globalization has on small American businesses and management.

Social ResponsibilityBy: Shelley Godra | 11/03/2009 | Ethics
This article takes both viewpoints on whether or not an organization should be socially responsible.

Shelley Godra has 5 articles online.
Contact Author
Subscribe to RSS
Print article
Publish this Article
Send to friend Article Categories All Categories News & Society Causes & OrganizationsCultureEconomicsEnvironmentFreeJournalismMen's IssuesNaturePhilosophyPoliticsRecyclingWeatherWomen's Issues


Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog
Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map
Webmasters
Partner with Us
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us
Business Info
Advertising
Article Writing
Partner with Us
Sign up for our email newsletter
Receive updates, enter your email below

Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (0.57, 12) var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));try {var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-318473-1");pageTracker._trackPageview();} catch(err) {} var dc_UnitID = 14;var dc_PublisherID = 1175;var dc_AdLinkColor = '009900';var dc_isBoldActive= 'no';var dc_open_new_win = 'yes';var dc_adprod='ADL';document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='http://kona.kontera.com/javascript/lib/KonaLibInline.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));//$.get('/updvw.php?id=812537');$.getScript("http://www.articlesbase.com.php5-8.websitetestlink.com/updvw2.php?id=812537&ref="+encodeURIComponent(document.referrer));function relocateDeferredContent() { var divs=document.getElementsByTagName("div"); var replacements=new Array(); for(var i=0;i
pharmacy