David Kramer: Obamaâs Administration Can Marginalize Ukraine
Free Online Articles Directory Why Submit Articles? Top Authors Top Articles FAQ Publish Article Hello Guest | Login | Register Email Password Remember Me
forgot your password?
Home Page News & Society David Kramer: Obama?s Administration Can Marginalize Ukraine David Kramer: Obama?s Administration Can Marginalize Ukraine Posted: Jun 19th, 2009 | Comments: 0 | Views: 5 | var addthis_pub="articlesbase"; var random_number = Math.random(); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='http://js.articlesbase.com/gadsA.js?v=1.0008' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); Syndicate this Article Copy to clipboard David Kramer: Obama?s Administration Can Marginalize UkraineAuthor: y2009k
Last time we talked to David Kramer in November 2007. Then he was a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, responsible for Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, and Belarus affairs, and later an Assistant Secretary of State.
Then during the interview for ?Glavred? David Kramer specified what Ukraine should do for the USA to support the plan of actions of Kiev referring to NATO membership. Specifically he told about a letter for the NATO Secretary General that should have been signed by Ukrainian Leaders.
Today David Kramer serves in an influential German Marshall Fund of the United States and is considered as one of the main supporters of Ukraine in Washington. We met right after another failure of BYT (Bloc of Yulia Timoshenko) and the Party of Regions to ally in a common constitutional way. That is why David Kramer and other numerous upholders of Ukraine in Washington breathed freely: no one approved such a step and in such a time (before another elections). And the opinion, often sounded during the talks of ?Glavred? with American experts, mainly resulted in the idea that Viktor Yushchenko should resign and stop this mess.
Today you are one of the main upholders of Ukraine in Washington. You support Ukraine, because the Administration of Obama doesn?t give urgent attention to Ukraine. Or are there any other reasons?
A country with 46 million population in the heart of Europe with a great potential should be of priority for the United States. The success of Ukraine can enhance the chances for success in neighboring countries, even in Russia. That is why the processes in your country should be precisely observed. And only Ukrainians themselves should choose your leaders and the foreign policy direction.
It?s difficult to have affairs with your country due to Ukrainian policy. Experts and analysts on Ukraine are tired and greatly disappointed. But in some issues we should omit this disappointment and understand the importance of the country. I was a co-author of a recent article for Foreign Policy, - surely you read it.
There I wrote that I would like for the President Obama to visit Ukraine.
It?s difficult as elections are coming. It?s difficult as the political situation is unfavorable ? but the case is what the USA should demonstrate: they support the country and people, but not leaders. I am a bit worried that Obama?s Administration will marginalize Ukraine. I know people from this Administration who care a lot about this country...
For example...
For example Michael MacFaul who supports Ukraine sincerely despite he is responsible for Russia in the National Security Council... There is Phil Gordon in the State Department (Deputy Secretary of State ? Edit.) and others. What I?m trying to do even outside the Government is for the USA to give deserved attention to Ukraine.
What do you usually say to those American diplomats and politicians, who think that Ukraine doesn?t deserve the attention of the United States and Obama visit due Ukrainian behavior?
I tell them, that Ukraine puts many efforts into the struggle against terrorism. I tell them that Ukraine together with Belarus and Kazakhstan refused of nuclear weapon. I tell them that it plays a significant role in Europe in the sphere of energy and in economy in general. I try to remind them (luckily many of them remember this) that Ukraine is important. I also add that in spite of disappointment and persistent political instability, Ukraine remains a peaceful, democratic country acting in the framework of constitution.
Frankly speaking, I was nervous about constitutional reform. It seemed to me that there was an attempt to deprive people of the right to choose a President, which is a bad idea. Ukraine really needs a constitutional reform, but not in this way ant not in such a time as now before Presidential elections.
In the mentioned article for Foreign Policy you also wrote that Ukraine is a ?right country in a right place?. It?s clear about the place, but why is it right?
I meant its sizes, its potential. If Ukraine leads another elections under international standards, it will make a very significant way of democratic development. Ukraine is a right country to help it and to be sure that there will be no economic collapse. But again we can?t help the country that is not able to help itself.
Washington is worried that current Presidential elections in Ukraine won?t be free and fair?
(Sighs) I think that modern history of Ukrainian elections demonstrates that Ukraine is able to hold free and fair elections. I can?t understand why oncoming elections can be unfair or not free. Another thing would happen provided the planned constitutional reform is accomplished. And now, as you know Ukrainian Mass Media has never been so free as today, thus there should be no problem with the campaign coverage. Hardly will also administrative resource change. That is why I expect that Ukraine will be able to hold fair elections.
Which is the way out of persistent political instability in Ukraine for the USA? And do you observe it in the short run?
I?d like to observe it... (sighs). Political instability seems to be endless. You need political leaders who value the interests of the country more than their own. This is not a unique problem of Ukraine. This problem is observed in other countries, but with the help of ?Orange revolution?, free press, fair elections Ukraine demonstrated that it is able to move forward. Yes, this is a complicated period ? due to economic situation on the eve of Presidential campaign. But I hope that the situation will improve after the Presidential campaign and people will compete in a more ?competitive? manner, using more adequate methods.
Who can be the most adequate partner of the USA among potential candidates for the President?
I can?t give you the answer you expect (laughs). I?d say that we need powerful democratic Ukraine, headed by the leaders, chosen in free and fair elections. This is my diplomatic answer (laughs).
I?ve just wanted to note the same thing. They say that there are no former diplomats in the United States...
(Laughs)
What is the main reason due to which Obama can?t visit Ukraine? Russia, political instability in Ukraine, Presidential elections?
There are few reasons. One of them is time and his schedule. You know, that American Presidents should be in the US on the 4th of July (Independence Day ? Edit.), and already on the 6th he is visiting Moscow. And also he will participate in the G8 Summit in Italy. I would like to include Ukraine into this list. And even more I would like for Obama to pay an official visit to Ukraine, but I don?t think it is possible at the moment. And there will be no sense in visits after July as pre-election campaign will start. And all these talks about constitutional reform will hardly help.
Thus, regarding your question, I don?t think that Russia is the reason due to which the President won?t visit Ukraine. It?s because Presidential schedule is pretty full at the moment.
Do you think the issue of the integration of Ukraine into NATO is not topical for the USA?
No, I don?t think it?s not topical. As you know in the end of George Bush Presidency Ukraine and the United States signed a Charter on integration into NATO. This issue should be laid off for the period of pre-election campaign as it will be hardly covered correctly. Ukraine should hold a discussion of NATO issue but after Presidential campaign, as the support is still low ? only 30%...
But 30% is not that little for Ukraine...
Yes, it?s more than it was, but still this issue should be followed by informational campaign. NATO would like to see greater support if Ukraine is really interested to move forward. Common stance of political leaders is also urgent to join NATO.
The letter signed by Yushchenko, Timoshenko and Yatsenyuk previous January demonstrated such a unanimity, that is why the United States actively supported the development of the Plan of NATO membership. Provided there was no such a letter, there would have been no such support. That is why it?s better to raise this issue after Presidential elections in Ukraine, depending of course on who will be the winner.
The only thing that we should prevent is for this issue to be observed within the framework of Russia. If Ukraine is interested in NATO membership, than we shouldn?t impede this process only because Russia won?t like it: Russia doesn?t favor many things.
Can President Obama refuse of further NATO expansion under the pressure of Russia?
I hope no. Considering the statement of President Obama on March the 23rd after the meeting with NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, it was a great statement (he claimed that NATO should open its doors for all countries willing to join the alliance ? Edit.). I hope that the Administration won?t be suppressed by Russia.
However, in this case the reset button will be also inefficient as the view of the United States on NATO expansion is more than demonstrative for Russia...
You are right. For Russia it?s a very important moment. Lately some representatives of Washington have started talking about ?Finlandization? of Ukraine ? and I think this is insulting. I?m convinced that Ukrainian people should define their future independently from Russia and the USA.
Will President Medvedev raise an issue on NATO expansion in general and with Ukraine during the meeting with Obama in July?
Probably. But it would be of no use as the answer will be negative. President Obama doesn?t recognize the division into influence spheres, supported in Moscow. But I perfectly imagine that sooner or later these issues will reveal and lead to a conflict between these two states. I hope to be mistaken, but it?s inevitable. This happened during the presidency of Bush, the same will be during Obama.
Article Source: ArticlesBase.com - David Kramer: Obama?s Administration Can Marginalize Ukraine
Last time we talked to David Kramer in November 2007. Then he was a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, responsible for Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, and Belarus affairs, and later an Assistant Secretary of State.
Then during the interview for ?Glavred? David Kramer specified what Ukraine should do for the USA to support the plan of actions of Kiev referring to NATO membership. Specifically he told about a letter for the NATO Secretary General that should have been signed by Ukrainian Leaders.
Today David Kramer serves in an influential German Marshall Fund of the United States and is considered as one of the main supporters of Ukraine in Washington. We met right after another failure of BYT (Bloc of Yulia Timoshenko) and the Party of Regions to ally in a common constitutional way. That is why David Kramer and other numerous upholders of Ukraine in Washington breathed freely: no one approved such a step and in such a time (before another elections). And the opinion, often sounded during the talks of ?Glavred? with American experts, mainly resulted in the idea that Viktor Yushchenko should resign and stop this mess.
Today you are one of the main upholders of Ukraine in Washington. You support Ukraine, because the Administration of Obama doesn?t give urgent attention to Ukraine. Or are there any other reasons?
A country with 46 million population in the heart of Europe with a great potential should be of priority for the United States. The success of Ukraine can enhance the chances for success in neighboring countries, even in Russia. That is why the processes in your country should be precisely observed. And only Ukrainians themselves should choose your leaders and the foreign policy direction.
It?s difficult to have affairs with your country due to Ukrainian policy. Experts and analysts on Ukraine are tired and greatly disappointed. But in some issues we should omit this disappointment and understand the importance of the country. I was a co-author of a recent article for Foreign Policy, - surely you read it.
There I wrote that I would like for the President Obama to visit Ukraine.
It?s difficult as elections are coming. It?s difficult as the political situation is unfavorable ? but the case is what the USA should demonstrate: they support the country and people, but not leaders. I am a bit worried that Obama?s Administration will marginalize Ukraine. I know people from this Administration who care a lot about this country...
For example...
For example Michael MacFaul who supports Ukraine sincerely despite he is responsible for Russia in the National Security Council... There is Phil Gordon in the State Department (Deputy Secretary of State ? Edit.) and others. What I?m trying to do even outside the Government is for the USA to give deserved attention to Ukraine.
What do you usually say to those American diplomats and politicians, who think that Ukraine doesn?t deserve the attention of the United States and Obama visit due Ukrainian behavior?
I tell them, that Ukraine puts many efforts into the struggle against terrorism. I tell them that Ukraine together with Belarus and Kazakhstan refused of nuclear weapon. I tell them that it plays a significant role in Europe in the sphere of energy and in economy in general. I try to remind them (luckily many of them remember this) that Ukraine is important. I also add that in spite of disappointment and persistent political instability, Ukraine remains a peaceful, democratic country acting in the framework of constitution.
Frankly speaking, I was nervous about constitutional reform. It seemed to me that there was an attempt to deprive people of the right to choose a President, which is a bad idea. Ukraine really needs a constitutional reform, but not in this way ant not in such a time as now before Presidential elections.
In the mentioned article for Foreign Policy you also wrote that Ukraine is a ?right country in a right place?. It?s clear about the place, but why is it right?
I meant its sizes, its potential. If Ukraine leads another elections under international standards, it will make a very significant way of democratic development. Ukraine is a right country to help it and to be sure that there will be no economic collapse. But again we can?t help the country that is not able to help itself.
Washington is worried that current Presidential elections in Ukraine won?t be free and fair?
(Sighs) I think that modern history of Ukrainian elections demonstrates that Ukraine is able to hold free and fair elections. I can?t understand why oncoming elections can be unfair or not free. Another thing would happen provided the planned constitutional reform is accomplished. And now, as you know Ukrainian Mass Media has never been so free as today, thus there should be no problem with the campaign coverage. Hardly will also administrative resource change. That is why I expect that Ukraine will be able to hold fair elections.
Which is the way out of persistent political instability in Ukraine for the USA? And do you observe it in the short run?
I?d like to observe it... (sighs). Political instability seems to be endless. You need political leaders who value the interests of the country more than their own. This is not a unique problem of Ukraine. This problem is observed in other countries, but with the help of ?Orange revolution?, free press, fair elections Ukraine demonstrated that it is able to move forward. Yes, this is a complicated period ? due to economic situation on the eve of Presidential campaign. But I hope that the situation will improve after the Presidential campaign and people will compete in a more ?competitive? manner, using more adequate methods.
Who can be the most adequate partner of the USA among potential candidates for the President?
I can?t give you the answer you expect (laughs). I?d say that we need powerful democratic Ukraine, headed by the leaders, chosen in free and fair elections. This is my diplomatic answer (laughs).
I?ve just wanted to note the same thing. They say that there are no former diplomats in the United States...
(Laughs)
What is the main reason due to which Obama can?t visit Ukraine? Russia, political instability in Ukraine, Presidential elections?
There are few reasons. One of them is time and his schedule. You know, that American Presidents should be in the US on the 4th of July (Independence Day ? Edit.), and already on the 6th he is visiting Moscow. And also he will participate in the G8 Summit in Italy. I would like to include Ukraine into this list. And even more I would like for Obama to pay an official visit to Ukraine, but I don?t think it is possible at the moment. And there will be no sense in visits after July as pre-election campaign will start. And all these talks about constitutional reform will hardly help.
Thus, regarding your question, I don?t think that Russia is the reason due to which the President won?t visit Ukraine. It?s because Presidential schedule is pretty full at the moment.
Do you think the issue of the integration of Ukraine into NATO is not topical for the USA?
No, I don?t think it?s not topical. As you know in the end of George Bush Presidency Ukraine and the United States signed a Charter on integration into NATO. This issue should be laid off for the period of pre-election campaign as it will be hardly covered correctly. Ukraine should hold a discussion of NATO issue but after Presidential campaign, as the support is still low ? only 30%...
But 30% is not that little for Ukraine...
Yes, it?s more than it was, but still this issue should be followed by informational campaign. NATO would like to see greater support if Ukraine is really interested to move forward. Common stance of political leaders is also urgent to join NATO.
The letter signed by Yushchenko, Timoshenko and Yatsenyuk previous January demonstrated such a unanimity, that is why the United States actively supported the development of the Plan of NATO membership. Provided there was no such a letter, there would have been no such support. That is why it?s better to raise this issue after Presidential elections in Ukraine, depending of course on who will be the winner.
The only thing that we should prevent is for this issue to be observed within the framework of Russia. If Ukraine is interested in NATO membership, than we shouldn?t impede this process only because Russia won?t like it: Russia doesn?t favor many things.
Can President Obama refuse of further NATO expansion under the pressure of Russia?
I hope no. Considering the statement of President Obama on March the 23rd after the meeting with NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, it was a great statement (he claimed that NATO should open its doors for all countries willing to join the alliance ? Edit.). I hope that the Administration won?t be suppressed by Russia.
However, in this case the reset button will be also inefficient as the view of the United States on NATO expansion is more than demonstrative for Russia...
You are right. For Russia it?s a very important moment. Lately some representatives of Washington have started talking about ?Finlandization? of Ukraine ? and I think this is insulting. I?m convinced that Ukrainian people should define their future independently from Russia and the USA.
Will President Medvedev raise an issue on NATO expansion in general and with Ukraine during the meeting with Obama in July?
Probably. But it would be of no use as the answer will be negative. President Obama doesn?t recognize the division into influence spheres, supported in Moscow. But I perfectly imagine that sooner or later these issues will reveal and lead to a conflict between these two states. I hope to be mistaken, but it?s inevitable. This happened during the presidency of Bush, the same will be during Obama.
Related Articles Related Q&A David Kramer: Obama?s Administration Can Marginalize UkraineSave Food, Save The WorldSample The Delights Of BahrainBp as a Poster for All Foreign Investors to See Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/news-and-society-articles/david-kramer-obamas-administration-can-marginalize-ukraine-980785.html Article Tags: g8, gordon, jaap de hoop scheffer, kramer, macfaul, medvedev, nato, obama, presidential elections, russia, timoshenko, ukraine, usa, yatsenyuk, yushchenko Add new Comment Your Name * Your Email: * Comment Body *
Enter Validation Code: *
Latest News and Society Articles More from y2009k How to Access Free Public RecordsBy: Tomas | 22/06/2009
The wealth of information available on the Internet includes public records. But there?s a big catch: a lot of it is not available online. We can expect more records to appear online as the Internet becomes more tightly woven into the fabric of everyday life. But, for now, journalists and others seeking information on a property assessment, a conviction or a death may still have to make trips down to city hall or the county courthouse.
The Brandenburg Gate A Sight to BeholdBy: huangyuzhu | 22/06/2009
The Brandenburg Gate, located west of the city of Berlin, is one of the main symbols of both the city and the country of Germany. When you visit Berlin, you will find this important national symbol and tourist attraction just west of the Pariser Platz. It is the former city gate and is the entrance to the Under den Linden, which is a boulevard of linden trees that at one time led to the city palace of the Prussian monarchs of the country.
Have the Time of Your Life at Theme Parks in GermanyBy: huangyuzhu | 22/06/2009
When you look at the number and types of theme parks in Germany, you can plan one or more vacations based on these attractions alone. For those with a yen for off-roading experiences, you just have to visit the VW Autostadt Complex in Woksburg. Under the supervision of a qualified instructor you will learn how to navigate steps and water barriers and handle an off-road vehicle in hazardous situations.
Milkor MGL Mk 1 forty mm grenade launcher - SBy: Ernest Guy | 22/06/2009
milkor MGL Mk one forty mm grenade launcher - South AfricaThe Milkor MGL six-shot 40mm grenade launcher is the first heavily produced multi-shot 40mm hand held weapon. Developed by the South-African company Milkor, it entered production in 1983, and served with South-African Countrywide Defense Forces for over 20 years. Since the 1996, an enhanced version of the basic design entered the production, it's been chosen MGL Mk.1. The Milkor MGL is also employed by more...
New Tel Aviv bar bans IDF soldiers in uniform, settlement productsBy: Admin@thesurvivalistforum.com | 22/06/2009
A new vegan bar opened last week in Tel Aviv that bans Israel Defense Forces soldiers in uniform and boycotts products made in West Bank settlements.
A Riot Gun is a non-lethal weapon By: Ernest Guy | 21/06/2009
A riot gun or less-lethal launcher is a variety of firearmFirearmA firearm is a tool that projects either single or multiple missiles at high velocity through a controlled explosion. The firing is achieved by the gases produced through rapid, confined combustion of a propellant.... that is used to fire less than deadly ammunitionAmmunitionAmmunition, often referred to as ammunition, is a common term derived from the French langu...
Instant Background Check Throught The InternetBy: Ben Dave | 21/06/2009
One of the first things to do when investigating people is to conduct a Self Background Check.
Only the Ignorant Appose Legalizing MarijuanaBy: Cooper Hill | 21/06/2009
As we seem to get closer and closer to actually legalizing marijuana... it seems like a ridiculous amount of studies are coming out claiming marijuana alters dna or marijuana causes cancer... but in all these studies apposing marijuana, there is one thing in common, there are no statistics about the study or even evidence to a proper analysis.
The Search For Independence From Russian MonopolyBy: y2009k | 19/06/2009 | News & Society
Lately, the relations between Minsk and Kiev have intensified evidently. It is considered that they are stimulated by the EU program ?Eastern Partnership? launched on May 7th and in the end of the project of ?Union state?, marked by a scandalous statement of Russian Vice Prime-Minister and the Minister of Finance Aleksey Kudrin about oncoming collapse of Belarusian economy made on May 28th in Minsk.
David Kramer: Obama?s Administration Can Marginalize UkraineBy: y2009k | 19/06/2009 | News & Society
Today David Kramer serves in an influential German Marshall Fund of the United States and is considered as one of the main supporters of Ukraine in Washington. We met right after another failure of BYT (Bloc of Yulia Timoshenko) and the Party of Regions to ally in a common constitutional way. That is why David Kramer and other numerous upholders of Ukraine in Washington breathed freely.
Neo-Imperial Policy of Russia and Central AsiaBy: y2009k | 15/06/2009 | Politics
Russia Loses the Region For Good.
Expected Turn within Common European Policy in South CaucasusBy: y2009k | 15/06/2009 | Politics
German Bundestag adopted a Resolution on the South Caucasus situation. This document stipulates for the Government definite estimating political and legal guides of political course towards the region.Rovshan Rzayev, a deputy of Milli Maclis (National Assembly) , the deputy Chairman of Parliamentary Committee on Law Policy and State-Building. He is a member of German-Azerbaijani Inter-Parliamentary Friendship Group.
Transit ? Klondike of KazakhstanBy: y2009k | 03/06/2009 | News & Society
Logist Geography of transit is a complete priority of Kazakhstan. There are only few countries in the world that have no access to a seaway but possess such a great potential for international transit.
OSCE In Georgian Dead EndBy: y2009k | 20/05/2009 | News & Society
On May the 18th-19th another round of international discussions in the framework of Geneva process and the discussions of the Parties on the development of new UNO Mission mandate took place.
International Security and Its Influence on Fuel and Energy Complex of Caspian RegionBy: y2009k | 18/05/2009 | News & Society
Fuel and Energy Complex (FEC) covers the sphere of mining and production of energy resources, processing, delivery and consumption of all types of energy. FEC of Caspian region that includes all Central Asia, Caucasus and Caspian Sea adjoining regions of Russian Federation and the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) is pretty well developed and includes oil and gas industries, power industry grounding of thermal and hydroelectric power plants, and also a great number of coal and natural uranium field
Marathon of Prague Summits is OverBy: y2009k | 12/05/2009 | News & Society
Two of four summits held in Prague under the aegis of the EU attracted attention of world media the most: on the issues of Polish-Swedish initiative of Eastern Partnership and ?Southern Corridor ? New Silk Road?. Participants of these summits singed political declarations.
y2009k has 29 articles online.
Author feedback
Subscribe to RSS
Print article
Publish this Article
Send to friend
Article Categories All Categories News & Society Causes & OrganizationsCultureEconomicsEnvironmentFreeJournalismMen's IssuesNaturePhilosophyPoliticsRecyclingWeatherWomen's Issues
Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog
Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map
Webmasters
Partner with Us
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us
Business Info
Advertising
Article Writing
Partner with Us
Sign up for our email newsletter
Receive updates, enter your email below
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (0.17, 1) var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));try {var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-318473-1");pageTracker._trackPageview();} catch(err) {}_qoptions={qacct:"p-53CbLQg6PHGMA"}; var dc_UnitID = 14;var dc_PublisherID = 1175;var dc_AdLinkColor = '009900';var dc_isBoldActive= 'no';var dc_open_new_win = 'yes';var dc_adprod='ADL';document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='http://kona.kontera.com/javascript/lib/KonaLibInline.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));//$.get('/updvw.php?id=980785');$.getScript("http://www.articlesbase.com.php5-8.websitetestlink.com/updvw2.php?id=980785&ref="+encodeURIComponent(document.referrer));function relocateDeferredContent() { var divs=document.getElementsByTagName("div"); var replacements=new Array(); for(var i=0;idocument.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='http://toolbar.wibiya.com/toolbarLoader.php?toolbarId=102' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
posted by bublik at
00:38
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home